Lifesitenews intervjuer Päivi Räsänen

Foto: Cowomen fra Unsplash
Foto: Cowomen fra Unsplash

Lifesite news’ Jonathon Von Maren har intervjuet den finske politikeren Pävi Räsänen som fortsatt er under etterforskning av politiet for påstått hat-kriminalitet mot LHBTIQ-personer.

Back in May, I wrote a column for First Things on the ongoing persecution of Finnish politician Päivi Räsänen, who has been consistently targeted over the past several years by LGBT activists for her outspoken advocacy of biblical sexual ethics. Since I interviewed her last, she has been interrogated by Finnish police yet again—simply for articulating her Christian beliefs in public.

Det som er svært interessant i denne saken, er at Räsänen ikke er noen hvem som helst. Hun er tidligere statsråd og altså en offentlig person. Kravet om å bøye seg for den radikale kjønnsideologien gjelder altså alle.

Räsänen is not an insignificant figure in Finland. From 2004 to 2015, she served as chair for the Christian Democrats, and from June 2011 to May 2015 she was Minister for the Interior of Finland. Her husband is a Lutheran pastor, and her Christian views were well-known. Not until Section 10 of Finland’s Criminal Code dealing with hate speech was amended in 2011 to include “sexual orientation” did she run into any trouble. Suddenly, the expression of orthodox Christian views held by countless millions could possibly considered hate speech, and perhaps even prosecutable. That, at least, is what Räsänen’s persecutors are hoping.

This month, I spoke with her again about the details of her case. Anyone who values freedom of speech and freedom of religion should be paying close attention— Räsänen’s ordeal could easily happen in Canada or the United States someday soon.

LifeSite: What is the background of your case?

Päivi Räsänen: All in all, the Finnish Police Force is conducting four separate criminal investigations against me. In all of these cases, I am accused of criminal agitation against a minority group, primarily for quoting the Bible in a tweet, for a 16-year old pamphlet, and for speaking according my Christian faith in a radio and a television program.

An individual citizen X first made a criminal complaint and the police made a thorough decision that no pre-trial investigation will be commenced. The Prosecutor General, however, ordered also in this case, contrary to the decision of the police, a pre-trial investigation.

Siste avhør fant sted 25. august 2020. Det strafferettslige grunnlaget er lovgivning lik vår egen §185 i straffeloven. Räsänen sier det er vanskelig når selv ikke aktoratet vet når en handling er i strid med loven:

What are the latest developments in this case?

I was interrogated at the Main Police Station in Pasila, Helsinki at 10:00 AM on 25 August 2020 on suspicion of ethnic agitation against a group. I went gladly to discuss with the police about these issues once again, but I am concerned that the investigations and interrogations cause fear of limiting freedom of religion and free speech. I will give the concluding statement about this Stiller case to the police next month.

Why are investigations still ongoing after you have been cleared multiple times?

The police have not yet finished the criminal investigation, so the process is still ongoing. After the police have finished it, they will send their decision to the Prosecutor General. These police investigations will lead to consideration of charges, which will result either in a prosecution or acquittal. The police did not find any justifications required in the Criminal Investigation Act that would necessitate in this case a pre-trial investigation with a police interrogation, but the Prosecutor General ordered a pre-trial investigation. It is confusing for the due process of law if highly educated authorities disagree about whether a crime has happened, or if a parliamentarian, who has served over 25 years, does not recognize a potential crime.

What is the likely outcome of this case?

According to the Criminal Code of our country, this crime carries the sentence of a fine or imprisonment for a maximum of two years. Depending on the decision of the Prosecutor General, the cases will be handled by court. If the Prosecutor General decides to prosecute, it is likely that this will be a process of several years.

What is the significance of your case to LGBT activists?

The aim of the LGBT activists is to silence those voices that defend the system of two biological sexes and marriage as a union between man and wife. Ultimately this has to do with guilt and trying to solve it by silencing and preventing the possibility to teach and speak the teachings of the Bible in the public sphere.

I wonder whether these investigations are meant to cause censorship and timidity among people who have a Christian conviction. It is unfortunate how uncritically the ideology of sexual diversity and LGBT activism has been supported and endorsed even by churches. The attempt to break down the gender system based on two different genders hurts especially children. I believe that religious literacy and knowledge of the Bible have decreased so much that those making criminal complaints do not understand the basic concepts of Christianity about the creation of man, sin and salvation.

These police investigations have to do with whether it is legal to publicly confess and teach Bible-based views on man’s relationship with God. From the viewpoint of freedom of religion and free speech, these cases are precedents. I am a former police minister and I wonder whether these time-consuming investigations are a right way to use the scarce resources of the police.

 

Dele
Share on email
E-post
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Bli med i diskusjonen
Flere

Aktuelle nyheter

Pride flagg

Regnbuesalme for vielser

«Under regnbogens fargar kan vi strekke oss lenger», synges det i ny vigselssalme. Presten Solveig Spilling Bakkevig sier til Vårt Land at det er naturlig

Foto: Merakist fra Unsplash

Bryter NLA markedsføringsloven?

 Når NLA Høgskolen markedsfører seg, opplyser vi ikke direkte om vårt konservative ståsted i samlivsetikken. Det kan være et brudd på markedsføringsloven,  sier Gunn Vedøy,