Mistet embetet som fredsdommer fordi han mener barn har det best med en mor og en far

Nyheter
Foto: Branden Harvey fra Unsplash

This week, former magistrate Richard Page lost his appeal at the Employment Appeal Tribunal. The ruling could effectively bar Christians from holding positions in public office if they express a Christian view of marriage and family. The battle is not over for Richard; he “remains as faithful as ever to his beliefs and will bring his cases to the Court of Appeal.” Andrea Williams comments on the judgments.

The judgments

Disappointingly, but not unexpectedly, this past Wednesday Mr Justice Choudhury of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ruled against Richard Page in his cases against the Lord Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor, and against the Kent and Medway NHS Trust. Richard was first punished in 2014 for saying in an adoption matter that a child does best with a mother and a father and eventually removed from his position as a magistrate. He was later also removed from his position as a Non-Executive Director of the NHS Trust for further expressing his belief in media interviews.

As a nation, we should all be very concerned that these rulings may mark another watershed moment in our nation’s history where holding sincere Biblical views can amount to a bar to public office. As Christians, we should do everything in our power to make sure that this is not the case. Richard remains as faithful as ever to his beliefs and will bring his cases to the Court of Appeal.
Les mer: Christian Concern

Dele
Share on email
E-post
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Bli med i diskusjonen
Flere

Aktuelle nyheter

Jordan Peterson om pubertetsblokkere

I forbindelse med debatten om medikamentell behandling av ungdommer som lider av kjønnsdysfori, blir det ofte hevdet at pubertetsblokkere er reversible, det vil si at